CPL Information for Authors
- Regular Papers
- Special Topics
- Links - authors guide, forms and style files
- Final paper preparation
Regular PapersConstraint Programming Letters will publish original, unpublished research on constraint programming within its scope.
All claims should be clearly articulated and supported either by empirical experiments or theoretical analyses. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to implement their work and to demonstrate its utility on significant problems; any experiments reported should be reproducible. Papers describing systems should clearly describe the contributions or the principles underlying the system. Papers describing theoretical results should also discuss their practical utility. In general, it should be clear how the work advances the current state of understanding and why the advance matters. Papers should report on what was learned in doing the work, rather than merely on what was done.
Authors must clearly acknowledge the contributions of their predecessors. If a paper introduces new terminology or techniques, it should also explain why current terminology or techniques are insufficient.authors guide).
Articles may be accompanied by online appendices containing data, demonstrations, instructions for obtaining source code, or the source code itself if appropriate. We strongly encourage authors to include such appendices along with their papers. (Note: if an online appendix contains source code, we will require you to sign a release form prior to publication freeing us from liability.)
To submit a paper, please
- Prepare it in PDF or Postscript (if the submission contains multiple files, please create an archive in tar or gzip format).
- Ensure that the file is less than 5Mb in size.
- Rename the file so that its extension indicates the type (.ps or .pdf).
- Ensure that the title page contains
- complete name, post and e-mail address of the corresponding author;
- a condensed running title of fifty (50) characters or less
- a list of five key-words
- an abstract that does not exceed 200 words
Every submission will be acknowledged.
CPL reviewers are instructed to make recommendations to accept or reject. If a paper requires substantial revisions, it will not be accepted. In this case, the area editor in charge of the paper may recommend that the author submit a revised version, but there is no guarantee it will be reviewed by the same referees, or that it will eventually be published. A paper may be revised and resubmitted at most once. To avoid misunderstandings about interpretation of reviewer and editor recommendations, we encourage authors to contact the editors in chief prior to resubmission with any salient questions.
If a paper is accepted, the editor and reviewers may require minor revisions. The author should return the revised paper as soon as possible. Normally, authors will have up to three months to accomplish their revisions. Upon receiving a revised paper the editor may, at their discretion, ask the reviewers to re-review the revised paper. Electronic publication will occur immediately upon receipt of the final version of an accepted article.authors guide for a detailed checklist of post-acceptance actions.
Proposing a Special TopicIf you would like to propose a special topic, please submit a short proposal outlining:
- Topic area and why it is important
- Guest editors' expertise in the technical area, and with reviewing and editing
- Plan for circulating the call for papers
- Dates for submission, accept/reject decisions, and final versions
- Desired number of pages
CaveatsHere are some things we have observed about special issues, which are useful to keep in mind.
Special issues tend to have somewhat lower quality papers than regular issues. This may be because: it's a somewhat more closed community that is reviewing and making decisions; or that papers are often invited by the guest editors, who then find it difficult to reject marginal ones. In any case, it's important to be aware of this phenomenon and try to keep it in check.
Special issues almost always run late. Sometimes very drastically so. Guest editors almost always underestimate the amount of work required to manage the issue and the difficulty of extracting reviews from even the best-intentioned of their colleagues.
- Authors guide: authors-guide.html
- Reviewers guide: reviewer-guide.html
- Instructions for Formatting CPL Articles: http://www.constraint-programming.org/letters/format/format.html.
- Common formatting errors: format/formatting-errors.html
- Annotated sample CPL paper: LaTeX source,
- CPL LaTeX style: cpl2e.sty
Permission to publish form: PDF
- Software release form: PostScript and PDF formats. To be sent along with the permission to publish form if any executable code is made available as part of an online appendix.
Links and portions of this text reproduced by kind permission of the Journal of Machine Learning Research.